no to je ten problem - vrcholovi sportovci maju cas na 7-8+ hodinove treningy x-krat do tyzdna. pre beznych smrtelnikov je takato zona v takom objeme vzhladom na casove moznosti reativne mimo.
tiez mam tendenciu sa drzat toho co mi odporuca sportovy lekar a co mi peknym sposobom posuva cisla hore - ten mi vravi ze vzhladom na casove moznosti a uroven vybudovanej vytrvalosti (vzhladom na priemerneho hobbika) sa nad "treningom" (vozenim sa pri ktorom sa chcem niekam posunut) pod 80% nemam ani zamyslat...
tiez je to celkom v sulade s tymito zisteniami ktorym mam tiez tendenciu celkom verit ohladne HIITu vzhladom na to co som napisal v predchadzajucom odstavci:
"Benefits
Aerobic benefits
Studies by Tabata,[7] Tremblay[14] and others have explored the effectiveness of this method compared to traditional endurance training methods. A 2008 study by Gibala et al.[15] demonstrated 2.5 hours of sprint interval training produced similar biochemical muscle changes to 10.5 hours of endurance training and similar endurance performance benefits. According to a study by King,[16] HIIT increases the resting metabolic rate (RMR) for the following 24 hours due to excess post-exercise oxygen consumption, and may improve maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) more effectively than doing only traditional, long aerobic workouts.[17][18][19][20] Tabata's 1997 study concluded that "intermittent exercise defined by the IE1 protocol may tax both the anaerobic and aerobic energy releasing systems almost maximally."[10]"
ale ano - urcite kazdy jeden reagujeme na jednotlive pristupy k
treningu inak, niektorych posuva dopredu rychlejsie aktivita s tepmi na urovni prechadzky okolo panelaku/pozerania akcneho filmu/hororu a niekoho vozenie sa nad 80%