tldr;
predpokladam ze toto je zakladny bod toho co sa snazis zlahcovat.
v kazdom pripade ak mas chut vysvetli to ISW urcite mas prehlad o situacii lepsi ako oni...
ISW nie je zly zdroj informacii, ale urcite nie je dobre brat ako ho jediny spravny. Je zufalo pomaly za udalostami a navyse dost povrchny. ISW sa odvolava na zdroj z WSJ (Wall Street Journal), co su naozaj specialisti na vojnu na UA, ze?
Ja nic nespochybnujem, ale zopar mudrejsich ludi ano. Napriklad taky Cooper, ktory je na
noze s polovicou zapadnych analytikov (raz za mesiac silno na nich nadava) by ti o tom povedal svoje. Staci sledovat jeho uvahy a analyzy a nebudes verit blbstiam z mainstremu.
Ukazka z jeho posledneho vlogu
‘For the end’ today, one more observation regarding war-maps circulated around the social media. When it comes to the situations in southern Zaporizhzhya an south-western Donetsk, most of drawers seem to remain ‘obsessed’ with the Russian double anti-tank ditch.
This is still (mis)declared into the Russian ‘1st Defence Line’, and thus the Ukrainian advance is gauged by how much of those two ditches the ZSU controls….or not.
Once again: that’s completely wrong. Yes, there are these two big anti-tank ditches. They are easy to find on satellite maps and thus attracting most attention.